Tony and Pegg Campolo
Open and Informing Resource List:

Transcript of a 20 year old presentation from Tony and Peggy Campolo about their differences on the question of marriage and gender in the church:


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15867871/ONA%20copy/tony-peggy-campolo-homosexuality.pdf

Karma and the Kingdom

Introduction

We are going to be talking about one of Jesus’ most vivid parables today, of rich and poor, of justice and injustice, and heaven and the fires of hell. Before we get there though we really have to set the stage, and to do that I first need to convince you that you and I mostly live our lives according to a sense of Karma, a bit of an unusual statement for someone speaking in a church professing to follow Christ. So let’s look at the definition of Karma, and turn to that definitive source of wisdom, Wikipedia:

Karma … refers to the spiritual principle of cause and effect where intent and actions of an individual (cause) influence the future of that individual (effect). Good intent and good deed contribute to good karma and future happiness, while bad intent and bad deed contribute to bad karma and future suffering.

We all Karma

I suggest to you that the embedded cultural view we all share is basically Karmic. For example, I think you can all complete these statements:

            What goes around… (comes around)

            You get what you… (pay for; deserve)

            You made your bed, so you… (lie in it)

            Ying and… (yang)

            As you sow, so shall you… (reap)

That last one should surprise you. It is from the Apostle Paul, Galatians 6:7. So did Paul believe in Karma? Does the Bible actually teach a version of Karma?

On the surface, the bible seems to have a lot of Karmic philosophy. For example, from Joshua chapter 1 verse 8, the Lord spoke to Joshua:

Keep this book of the law always on your lips; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful.

Or on a less ominous note, Proverbs 6:10-11:

A little sleep, a little slumber,

A little folding of the hands to rest—

And poverty will come on you like a thief

And scarcity like an armed man.

There it is! You get what you deserve and what goes around comes around!

Job and Karma

If you want to read a whole book about the debate over Karma, read Job. Job is one of the earliest books of the Bible from a historical perspective. It is clearly written as a morality play, with a prologue, at least 3 acts between Job and his so-called friends, a dramatic climax where God himself answers Job’s complaints, and then an epilogue where everything is resolved, after a fashion.

Job is described as a righteous man, yet faces trouble that we get to see is not of his own making. In the prologue we learned that Satan, up to his tricks, incites God, telling him that Job is only good for Karma’s sake. God disagrees, and allows Job to be tested severely. During these tests Job’s “friends,” who came to “comfort” him, show themselves to be card carrying members of the Karma Club. Helpfully, one says to him:

Consider now: Who, being innocent, has ever perished?

Where were the upright ever destroyed?

As I have observed, those who plow evil

And those who sow trouble reap it.

Do you hear it? Good things happen to good people, and we get what we deserve. Are there even echoes of Paul’s statement here, as you sow, so shall you reap?

Job’s friends didn’t get it, believing Job had to have done something wrong to have suffered misfortune. They were wrong, but they bring it all home for me. You see I think that we all expect Karma from life and God, and sometimes hope for Karma in some very strange ways.

My belief in Karma

For example, there are times I hope for Karma. I am pulling up to a yellow light, stopping as I should, and one or two cars in the other lane and behind me rush through as the light is turning red. No lemon; it’s all tomato. Other than muttered curses, I also look around hoping that for once a cop would show up so that justice would be done. In fact, my conservative approach to driving should highlight the evil behavior of other drivers, and make it easy for the police. This, despite my earnest hope, has never yet happened.

Sometimes I expect Karma to fall on me. Say I just might have eased it a bit over 70 on I-75 on the way up north. Completely justified, right? The rules for red lights are important, but for speeding… Then I see the dreaded blue sedan parked in the median and instinctively jerk my foot off the gas, once again looking around, but this time out of fear of seeing karmic justice fall on me.

For me, when I am honest, my deep-seated belief in Karma can get much more sinister. I am asked to care for a young person in the ICU due to a car accident. I look at the history; is there drug use, alcohol, texting. Something. I don’t wish it on them, but with every check box I am secretly noting the ways this person is not me or my close friends, and so this can’t happen to me. Please let Karma be intact! You might think this is implying that I believe the young person in some way got what they deserved. I don’t. God help me if I ever thought that. I think what is actually going on is a bit subtler.

When bad things happen, we all want to find a reason; we are like Job’s friends. And one reason we hope for this is to avoid facing the reality that the world often does not act in a Karmic way, and nor does God. I am looking for a reason to not be insecure. But bad things do happen to good people. We often don’t get what we deserve. The writer of Ecclesiastes expresses this frustration well (8:14):

There is something else meaningless that occurs on earth: the righteous who get what the wicked deserve, and the wicked who get what the righteous deserve. This too, I say, is meaningless.

So a sense of Karma permeates our culture and thinking, ancient cultures of at least some Biblical times, and can color our underlying beliefs about God. What does Jesus have to say about this very human way of navigating a dangerous and difficult world?

What did Jesus believe about Karma?

When Jesus walked out of the wilderness, he said something that changed the world and the way we think about it: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.” He didn’t say, “Repent, because you are a miserable sinner.” He didn’t say, “Repent, or suffer the fires of Hell!” He said to repent, or change your mind and behavior, because I am proclaiming a new way to think about life, the Kingdom of Heaven, and it is very different from what you have been taught and what you now believe.

Did he mean it? I believe the clarion call of his defining mission statement, the Sermon on the Mount, was “You have heard it said, but I say to you…” So, for instance, “You have heard it said do not murder, but I say to you if you are angry with your sister you will be judged. Call her a fool and you are in danger of the fires of hell.” That escalated quickly, and beyond simple Karma!

He says things like, “you have heard it was said, ‘do not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that if you look at a woman lustfully you have committed adultery in your heart.” Has your eye ever lingered over the SI Swimsuit Edition?

Jesus raises the bar way beyond the rules the spiritual leaders and the elite of his day had outlined so that they could feel Karmic peace about themselves, and look good in front of others.

But life in the Kingdom of Heaven goes so much further than Karma. ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth?’ Karma. ‘No, turn the other cheek.’ Kingdom. ‘Someone takes your shirt?’ Karma. ‘Give them your coat also.’ Kingdom.

But here is where Jesus sticks the knife into any notion we might have that Karma is in any way compatible with the Kingdom of Heaven:

You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.

Bam. The Kingdom of Heaven is not business as usual. Love your enemies. Recognize God loves your enemies. Don’t hope for Karma for them, and don’t expect it for yourself. Jesus goes so far as to say, “Do not resist an evil person.” How you get your head around that one? Dietrich Bonhoeffer struggled deeply with this very command of Jesus when he ultimately decided to participate in a plot to kill Hitler. These are not just pretty words. If we hear them and try to live them it will be the hardest thing we have ever done. This is a Kingdom, and the rule is a radically different than anything in our old way of thinking or experience. This is why we need to repent. We need to change the way we think and feel to live the Kingdom of Heaven. Jesus said the Kingdom of Heaven is near and that Kingdom is based on a radical and costly love we have not yet even imagined.

The Rich Man and Lazarus

So the first thing we need to remember to read this parable is our tendency to think in Karma. The second is more stagecraft.

So in a wider context, Luke 16:1 tells us Jesus is teaching his disciples. So imagine Jesus teaching here (area on the stage), and his disciples are gathered around him. But wait; there is more… In verse 14 we see a wider audience, the most revered religious people of the day, a group of Pharisees. They are standing or sitting over here (second location on the stage), just beyond the inner circle, listening with ill intent to everything Jesus is saying, looking for a way to discredit him in court and even have him killed. Simply remember the repeating theme of the Sermon on the Mount, “You have heard it said…, but I say to you…” The Pharisees were the “You have heard it saids.” Jesus had not been complimentary. Let may give you just one example of what Jesus said directly to them earlier in the gospel of Luke, chapter 11, verse 46:

And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.

Saying that kind of stuff to the powerful can get you killed. Jesus is aware of the stakes, and of his disciple’s need to understand the Kingdom of Heaven as it is radically different than what they have heard these teachers say.

So to the parable:

¹⁹ “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. ²⁰ At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores ²¹ and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

²² “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. ²³ In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. ²⁴ So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’

²⁵ “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. ²⁶ And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’

²⁷ “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, ²⁸ for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’

²⁹ “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’

³⁰ “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

³¹ “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

So this story could not be more “karmic.” You do evil, by active intent or by indifference, and you get punished; you suffer the fires of hades, horrible torment. Did Jesus really believe this? Is that the point of his story? This is an extraordinarily Greek idea. To the Greeks, on arrival at the Gates of Hades your final destination was determined by your deeds during life. To be condemned to ultimate torment was only true for the very worst people.* Justice was Karmic, and weighed by the scales of deed and thought.

There are many levels to this parable, but I think Jesus was being intentionally absurd, for the benefit of his disciples and to warn the Pharisees, who loved money and power. The Pharisees believed in a deep way they got what they deserved in life, while the poor beggar likely got what he deserved; Karma.

Jesus’ disciples also believed this deeply before learning of the Kingdom of Heaven from him. One time when they saw a blind man they asked Jesus who sinned, the man or his parents? Someone had to have! I believe one of the biggest challenges Jesus faced in ministry was to confront the cultural Karmic belief of his time and help his followers repent and begin to think and act from the Kingdom of Heaven and not Karma.

Let me give you one more example. Remember the story of the Rich Young Ruler? He was a good man who, unlike many of the Pharisees, actually did follow the rules and lived with compassion. Despite this he wanted to know what he needed to do to be saved. Jesus in essence said ‘One thing you lack: give up your Karma, the fortune you seem to feel you deserve, and follow me.’ He could not do it. It wasn’t fair. He walked away. The disciples could tell Jesus was truly moved and disappointed. Remember his response to the disciples? “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to be saved.” Now the disciples were mostly not rich, but they finally begin to understand what Jesus was really saying: you have to give up your Karma and live in the Kingdom of Heaven, and you won’t get what you deserve.

The disciples began to get it. They asked, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus’ answer is key to the parable we read: “What is impossible with man is possible with God.”

The Chasm

Remember what was impossible in the parable? There was this fixed chasm that could not be crossed between Abraham’s side and the torments of Hades. Who put it there? Did God really create the river Styx? Does he act out of a cosmic sense Karma? Would it delight him if we got what we deserved? Is that the Kingdom of Heaven Jesus proclaimed? If it is, then there is no place for the cross. The point of the Kingdom of Heaven is that you and I are not going to get what we deserve. Jesus did.

So if God didn’t create the chasm who or what does? I think the point of the story is that we construct this great chasm, and it is because we insist on our sense of Karma or justice, when it benefits us or makes us feel good about ourselves or condemns those we judge. And the more we cling to it, and the more we insist on it, the wider the chasm becomes. Karma permeates our thinking, the “You have heard it saids…” But the Kingdom of Heaven says to turn the other cheek, to not resist an evil person, to love your enemy and pray for them. The Kingdom of Heaven is not a balance of good and bad works that ultimately determines our eternal destiny. God’s justice is not Karma; it is grace at the cost of a cross. You see, unlike Karma, God causes his rain to fall on the righteous and the unrighteous.

Living the Kingdom of Heaven

So let me humbly preach the gospel to you; Karma is not like the Kingdom of Heaven we inherit as dearly loved children. We all need to repent and rethink life in light of the Kingdom of Heaven because we are not going to get what we deserve, and neither is our enemy.

How do we repent? Who do we need to forgive? Who do we need to love, who does not deserve it? Do we hate ISIS? Do we resent religious people who have hurt us deeply in the past because of our faith, or our beliefs about gender or race, or sexuality? If you get it, this is really hard stuff. Bonhoeffer and Hitler hard stuff. At a very deep level I want a bully to get what he or she deserves. But the Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven is really, really good news—it puts justice, fate and our sense of Karma firmly in God’s hands. We are therefore free to live from the Kingdom of Heaven, to love radically, and to be loved extravagantly by God.

Amen

* http://www.ancient.eu/Hades/    HADES THE UNDERWORLD

The god Hermes was believed to lead souls to the river Styx in the underworld, at which point the aged boatman Charon ferried them to the gates of Hades where Kerberos - the ferocious three-headed dog (or fifty-headed according to Hesiod) with serpents coming out of its body - stood guard to keep souls in rather than to keep others out. It was for payment to Charon that bereaved family members put a coin in the mouth of the deceased (for Greeks the traditional coin was the low-value obol). The unburied or those without the means to pay the boatman were condemned to wander the Earth as ghosts. This belief hints at the ambiguous nature of Hades. It was not necessarily a place of torment and suffering but in most cases, simply the final resting place of the soul.

On arrival at the gates of Hades, the final destination of the souls was determined by an assessment of their actions whilst they were alive. Traditionally, the three judges of souls were Minos, Rhadamanthys, and Aiakos, themselves noted for their honourable lives. Souls judged to have led especially good lives were first taken to drink the waters of the River Lethe which made them forget all bad things, and then they were taken to the idyllic Elysian Fields. Those souls judged to have led bad lives were put in the hands of the Furies and taken to Tartarus, the lowest level of Hades, to receive punishment for their misdeeds. The worst-offending souls, those who had offended the gods with their impiety, were condemned to eternal torment. Examples of those so punished were Sisyphos who had to forever roll a rock up a hill, Tantalos who could never quench his thirst, Oknos who plaits one end of a rope while a donkey eats the other end, the daughters of Danaus who had to try and fill a sieve with water, and Ixion who was tied to an ever-spinning wheel.

Launching

One young man off to Navy boot camp this week, and one still in college in India. One a Freshman at MSU and one still in high school. Raising children gets much easier with respect to the physical drain, but the emotional stakes become much higher. One holds to the promises (for you, your children and as many as the Lord shall call).

Process of Acceptance

I suppose the process of acceptance will pass through the usual four stages:
(i) this is worthless nonsense;
(ii) this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view;
(iii) this is true, but quite unimportant;
(iv) I always said so.
Journal of Genetics Vol. 58, page 464 (1963).

Twitter Fiction--100 character stories.

Temporal Displacement sounded like a killer app. Ironical, I mused, throwing my worthless iPhone in the raptor’s maw.

Generationally-Neutral Fiscal Policies

Our nation is facing a day of reckoning of debt. The costs of programs such as Medicare, Social Security and federal pensions will overwhelm any reasonable projection of future GDP in the next 20 or 30 years. While it is questionable if the Baby Boomers actually contributed enough over time to fund their anticipated golden retirement, even if they have done so this money, held in trust, is gone. President Obama recently convened a bipartisan commission to look at these “third rail” political issues, and though I commend the effort I am skeptical of the outcome.

In order to avert what will surely become a generational divide, we need to add another term to the budgeting lexicon. We talk at times about revenue-neutral policies and legislation. We need to speak of generationally-neutral fiscal policies as well. The current post-boomer generation is going to be saddled with trillions of dollars of national debt, and a legacy of unfunded, underfunded and looted mandates. They will refuse, as well they should, to support this burden, and they will have the growing political power to do so. Politicians are demonstrably unable to address this growing problem and be re-elected, and so a non-elected, broadly representative body of multi-partisan financial policy experts needs to vet legislation for generational neutrality. If the cost of a program, other than monies needed for national defense, exceeds the projected revenue of the generation benefiting from and implementing it, then that legislation goes back to Congress. I am ashamed of the fiscal situation that my children are inheriting from my generation and the one just before me, and we need to make the hard choices now to remedy this. If not, we will be passing down “the sins of the fathers unto their children to the third and forth generation. . .” This is not the legacy I want to leave for my children.

Children and Fathers

Daaaaaddeeeeeeee!!! The scream rang out through the fellowship hall as a 2 year old bundle of pigtails, pink cheeks and sneakers came barreling into the room, oblivious to the meeting in progress. Maggie caught my eye on her way to the nursery, and having not seen me all day, she was off like a shot. I sat at the back of the room, expecting her to come in with Kate and the rest of the kids anytime, and so I was ready for her. I met her halfway across the room and caught her up as she jumped into my arms, a wiggling, giggling bundle of unbridled joy. She rested her head on my shoulder and hugged my neck as I carried her back to the nursery and we got her settled in. Only a pulseless rock wouldn’t be moved to tears at a greeting like that. The guileless, reckless and unfettered love of a young child is a wondrous gift of God.

Mary Kay Dyer, our Children’s Minister, had just been teaching about one of her two favorite scriptures, Mark 10:13-16:

People were bringing little children to Jesus to have him touch them, but the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it." And he took the children in his arms, put his hands on them and blessed them.

This episode got me thinking about one of my favorite passages too, Hebrews 4:16:

Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.

Now Maggie is not perfect. She is a skillful 2 year old schemer, schmoozer, stinker and stomper, who realized young that wallflower is not the preferred posture when the youngest of 4. It is even remotely possible that she had been naughty earlier in the day, though to look in her eyes you would hardly believe it. If so, nothing could have been further from her mind when she saw me and ran for my arms. She hesitated not a moment with the thought I might turn away or shush her up because of some meeting. It never entered her mind I might stop her before she jumped into my arms to question her about her behavior that day. I was her daddy and she my little girl--end of story. She approached me full tilt, as a little child, absolutely confident of my unconditional love. She knows charm only goes so far, and that I will discipline her when needed and appropriate; still she runs to me with abandon, knowing deeply things about her father's love I am still learning about my heavenly father's.

Bill of (granted?/protected?) Rights

In an informal poll of friends and acquaintances as to the purpose of the Bill of Rights, I found that most people believed these amendments granted specific rights to citizens. I found that only rarely did people use language that described the Bill of Rights as a document protecting unalienable human rights from acts of Congress. Yet the language of the founding documents makes it clear that a chief concern of the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights was to protect the rights of citizens from the power of government. The Declaration of Independence is absolutely clear about the derivation of the rights outlined in the Constitution and the first 10 amendments:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed. . .

These rights therefore are basic human rights, and the role of government is to secure and protect them, but never to grant them. While the founders clearly saw the importance of a strong federal government in securing an environment where basic human rights could be protected and flourish, they were equally concerned about the propensity of governments, once established, to begin to limit the rights of citizens. The ringing tone of the first five words of the First Amendment could not make this point any clearer: "Congress shall make no law. . ."

In every discussion of the legitimate role of federal government it is important to remember that the framers of our government were as concerned about the tendency of any government or institution to overreach its power over the lives of the governed as they were concerned about protecting the free exercise of unalienable human rights from threats both foreign and domestic.

Screwtape on Physician Assisted Suicide

My dear Wormwood,

Our project is progressing nicely. The Michigan jury has spoken on physician-assisted suicide my dear nephew, and it is a particularly delicious stroke. I assure you your work is not unnoticed in low places. Yet there is much to be done, and no time for resting on laurels.

We must immediately raise objections to this new precedent of law; it is much too narrow for our purposes. While sterile, calculated deaths hold some pleasure, murders of passion and hate are much more satisfying, only bettered in our cause by random, senseless and remorseless mayhem. But I am ahead of the horse. Perhaps interest groups might object to physician exclusivity in the killing fields. While physicians are arguably most qualified to recognize death's glorious approach, there are but a few truly accomplished in the art. Many other professions are better qualified to bring about our purposes. Why exclude professional hunters? Assassins? Pyrotechnician-assisted suicide has a nice ring to it.

Raise the profit motive. Surely there is money in death, and human greed is legendary. Exploit it! Inspire entrepreneurs! I envision international corporations devoted to singularly spectacular exits. Fly them to the top of Everest or shoot the rich ones into what they perceive to be the heavens. The first human to Mars need not return. What about ultimate war games? The possibilities are boundless, so be creative.

Masterful is the only word to describe the way you have transformed a singularly odd, prematurely retired pathologist into a cultural icon. It serves to focus the vermin on death in the very act of avoiding its inevitable grip. To focus in any direction other than the moment of death is counterproductive. Dwelling on the time they have left might encourage them to treasure life, and this is to be avoided at all costs. They may even seek forgiveness one with another, and undo all our best work. Any focus beyond death is even more ominous, for too many have been snatched from our mouths even while the taste of them was on our tongues. Continue to encourage their skepticism about deathbed conversions and reconciliations. Bolster their revulsion for the act of death and anything smacking of less than glowingly vigorous health.

Wormwood, don't long allow them to hide the truth of their actions behind the guise of intractable physical pain (Is it not a sweet irony that while pain becomes more controllable ill-health is less tolerated?). Several of our good doctor's first "patients" were neither in much pain nor very near death, but suffered from psychological pain they simply would no longer bear. When they accept emotions as justification for suicide then we will have nearly all of them.
Allow physicians less control over the deathbed. There is far too much room for compassion and counseling for my tastes. Encourage them to capitulate all hard issues to the legislature and public opinion, arenas where we hold much sway. With proper laws in place we will make doctors feel more manipulated and controlled, and they will resent rather than revere their role at the deathbed. Perhaps they may even be coerced to resent the dying. Splendid!

My dear Wormwood, I see your career going only downward in glorious descent. Guard yourself from humility.

Your affectionate uncle,

Screwtape.
With apologies to C. S. Lewis

Professional Courtesy in the Bible

The following two contrasting biblical accounts of Jesus and the woman with a “flow of blood” seems to be the earliest example of profession courtesy that I have encountered in literature.

Mark. the Evangelist's version:

And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years. She had suffered a great deal under the care of many doctors and had spent all she had, yet instead of getting better she grew worse. When she heard about Jesus, she came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, because she thought, "If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed." Immediately her bleeding stopped and she felt in her body that she was freed from her suffering.

Luke, the Beloved Physician's version:

And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years, but no one could heal her. She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and immediately her bleeding stopped.

Thanks, Luke.

Pat Robertson?

I wonder what part of Romans 2:1 is not clear to him?

You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

Or Paul's conclusion in Romans 3:9-10?

What shall we conclude then? Are we any better? Not at all! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin. As it is written: "There is no one righteous, not even one."

I am also reminded of Jesus rebuking those who thought people inside a tower that collapsed must have been particularly despicable. He made the point in Luke 13:4-5:

Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish."

If there is any response required of believers in a disaster beyond compassion and aid, it is personal repentance, recognizing that we are as deserving of catastrophe as anyone else on the planet. Our prayers: "Lord, how can I help?" and "Have mercy on me, a sinner."

Aliens and Strangers

1 Peter 2:11. Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul.

1 Peter 3:15-16. But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, [16] keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.

Imagine yourself in Paris, sitting in the arrival gate observing the arrival of an international flight to France. First off is a woman in a conservative business suit, looking a bit haggard after a long flight. No one is here to meet her. She removes a small booklet from her pocket, obviously a travel guide, and steps aside to study it. Looking around she makes her way to a counter, where in a broken dialect she attempts to ask for directions to a hotel. The man behind the counter smiles broadly, holds up a finger and answers in practiced English, welcoming her to Paris. Next off is a garrish man in a leisure suit, lime green, with a videocam hanging off one shoulder and a 35 millimeter off the other. He spends the first few minutes in the terminal snapping pictures of various people, without permission. He singles out some kids off to the side, dressed in black leather and wearing their multicolored hair contrary to gravity. “Can you believe how these people dress?” he says, a bit too loudly. After a few minutes of gawking he walks over to the same counter and declares he needs to get to the Hotel Americana. The man stares at him with a politely confused look. “Whazza matter, don’t you speak English?” says the man. “Parle vous Frances?” the clerk replies. “Of course I don’t speak French; I’m just here for a vacation. Now where can I find out how to get to the Vatican?”

We are called by Christ to be strangers in this world, not to be strange. To be aliens, not to alienate. To be within our culture while yet not controlled by it. It takes a critical appraisal of our behavior to make this distinction. We fall into habits and patterns that may be the norm in our religious culture but that are perceived as strange by those we are called to reach, and alienates them for culture, and not because of Christ.

We are strangers in this world, or at least we should be, says Peter. Aliens, passport in hand, just off the boat, not quite ‘at home.’ We should feel the discomfort of not quite fitting in, like the first day of a new job, or the first weeks in a new school. Yet while we are to be strangers, we are certainly not to be strange. Though aliens, we are not to alienate. Paul says the same things when he declares that he strives “to be all things to all men.”

Legends of the Fall

There is a fascinating juxtaposition of verses from Genesis concerning the consequences of the fall of man. The curse for the man involved a cursing of the ground, so that he would have to toil for every scrap of food, working hard for the rest of his life simply to eat. This is confirmed by Lamech’s comments, the father of Noah:

28 When Lamech had lived 182 years, he had a son. 29 He named him Noah and said, "He will comfort us in the labor and painful toil of our hands caused by the ground the LORD has cursed."

The actual curse from Genesis 3 is as follows:

17 To Adam he said, "Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat of it,' Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life. 18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return."

After the flood, when Noah, son of Lamech, came out of the ark, God said in Genesis 8:

20 Then Noah built an altar to the LORD and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. 21 The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood.

So then, is the curse of the fall toward the man lifted? It certainly seems so from the context. History would also confirm this, because most of us, though having to work for a living, have an overabundance of food, and the ground is incredibly productive, allowing few of us to be farmers, and all of us to fulfill God’s desire to “fill the earth” with people.

So what now of the curse to the woman? Pain in childbirth can certainly be lessened by modern medicine, though childbirth for most women in the world is still the most dangerous experience of their lives. What of the rest of the curse from Genesis 3?:

16 To the woman he said, "I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."

One has to ask the question, ‘Of all the consequences in the human experience mentioned in the curses from the fall, is the curse of the husband ruling over his wife the only one not to be lifted from the shoulders of mankind?’ Clearly we are not referring to the consequence of sin that fell upon all mankind through the first Adam, and was lifted at the cost of the suffering of the second Adam. I conclude that any sense of a man or husband ruling over a woman or wife can only be seen to be a curse, and not God’s plan or desire. We are redeemed people, and we should live as such, co-heirs with Christ.

Bed Bugs!

Bed Bugs--a Drabble (100 word story)

“Please! Check under the bed,” the little brat brawled.

I stopped, my hand on the door, and sighed. “There are no monsters under the bed.”

“I heard something scraping,” he whined, louder still.

“OK, I will look under the bed if it will make you happy,” I said evenly.

I knelt down, leaning under the bed. A cold, foul vapor crept over my face. Red eyes shifted back and forth in the darkness, and teeth ground.

“No, nothing there,” I said, rising toward the door.

“Good night,” I whispered, turning out the light. “And don’t let the bed bugs bite.”

Hounds of Hell

Twitfiction:

Delirium. Hydrophobia. Fang marks. Classic rabies. Pentagram tattoo behind the ear? No, no! The Hounds of Hell again.