Tony and Pegg Campolo
Open and Informing Resource List:
Transcript of a 20 year old presentation from Tony and Peggy Campolo about their differences on the question of marriage and gender in the church:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15867871/ONA%20copy/tony-peggy-campolo-homosexuality.pdf
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Karma and the Kingdom
Introduction
We are going to be talking about one of Jesus’ most vivid
parables today, of rich and poor, of justice and injustice, and heaven and the
fires of hell. Before we get there though we really have to set the stage, and
to do that I first need to convince you that you and I mostly live our lives
according to a sense of Karma, a bit of an unusual statement for someone
speaking in a church professing to follow Christ. So let’s look at the definition
of Karma, and turn to that definitive source of wisdom, Wikipedia:
Karma … refers
to the spiritual principle of cause and
effect where intent and actions of
an individual (cause) influence the future of that individual (effect).
Good intent and good deed contribute to good karma and future happiness, while bad intent and bad deed contribute to bad
karma and future suffering.
We all Karma
I suggest to you that the embedded cultural view we all
share is basically Karmic. For example, I think you can all complete these
statements:
What goes
around… (comes around)
You get
what you… (pay for; deserve)
You made
your bed, so you… (lie in it)
Ying and…
(yang)
As you sow,
so shall you… (reap)
That last one should surprise you. It is from the Apostle
Paul, Galatians 6:7. So did Paul believe in Karma? Does the Bible actually teach
a version of Karma?
On the surface, the bible seems to have a lot of Karmic
philosophy. For example, from Joshua chapter 1 verse 8, the Lord spoke to
Joshua:
Keep this book of the law always on
your lips; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do
everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful.
Or on a less ominous note, Proverbs 6:10-11:
A little sleep, a little slumber,
A little folding of the hands to
rest—
And poverty will come on you like a
thief
And scarcity like an armed man.
There it is! You get what you deserve and what goes around
comes around!
Job and Karma
If you want to read a whole book about the debate over
Karma, read Job. Job is one of the earliest books of the Bible from a
historical perspective. It is clearly written as a morality play, with a
prologue, at least 3 acts between Job and his so-called friends, a dramatic
climax where God himself answers Job’s complaints, and then an epilogue where
everything is resolved, after a fashion.
Job is described as a righteous man, yet faces trouble that we get to see is not of his own making.
In the prologue we learned that Satan, up to his tricks, incites God, telling
him that Job is only good for Karma’s
sake. God disagrees, and allows Job to be tested severely. During these tests
Job’s “friends,” who came to “comfort” him, show themselves to be card carrying
members of the Karma Club. Helpfully, one says to him:
Consider now: Who, being innocent,
has ever perished?
Where were the upright ever
destroyed?
As I have observed, those who plow
evil
And those who sow trouble reap it.
Do you hear it? Good things happen to good people, and we
get what we deserve. Are there even echoes of Paul’s statement here, as you
sow, so shall you reap?
Job’s friends didn’t get it, believing Job had to have done something wrong to
have suffered misfortune. They were wrong, but they bring it all home for me.
You see I think that we all expect
Karma from life and God, and
sometimes hope for Karma in some
very strange ways.
My belief in Karma
For example, there are times I hope for Karma. I am pulling up to a yellow light, stopping as I
should, and one or two cars in the other lane and behind me rush through as the light is turning red. No lemon;
it’s all tomato. Other than muttered curses, I also look around hoping that for
once a cop would show up so that
justice would be done. In fact, my
conservative approach to driving should highlight
the evil behavior of other drivers, and make it easy for the police. This,
despite my earnest hope, has never
yet happened.
Sometimes I expect Karma to fall on me. Say I just might
have eased it a bit over 70 on I-75 on the way up north. Completely justified,
right? The rules for red lights are important, but for speeding… Then I see the
dreaded blue sedan parked in the median and instinctively jerk my foot off the
gas, once again looking around, but this time out of fear of seeing karmic justice
fall on me.
For me, when I am honest, my deep-seated belief in Karma can
get much more sinister. I am asked to care for a young person in the ICU due to
a car accident. I look at the history; is there drug use, alcohol, texting.
Something. I don’t wish it on them, but with every check box I am secretly
noting the ways this person is not me or my close friends, and so this can’t
happen to me. Please let Karma be intact! You might think this is implying that
I believe the young person in some way got what they deserved. I don’t. God
help me if I ever thought that. I think what is actually going on is a bit
subtler.
When bad things happen, we all want to find a reason; we are like Job’s friends. And
one reason we hope for this is to avoid facing the reality that the world often
does not act in a Karmic way, and nor does God. I am looking for a
reason to not be insecure. But bad things do
happen to good people. We often don’t
get what we deserve. The writer of Ecclesiastes expresses this frustration well
(8:14):
There is something else meaningless
that occurs on earth: the righteous who get what the wicked deserve, and the
wicked who get what the righteous deserve. This too, I say, is meaningless.
So a sense of Karma permeates our culture and thinking,
ancient cultures of at least some Biblical times, and can color our underlying
beliefs about God. What does Jesus have to say about this very human way of
navigating a dangerous and difficult world?
What did Jesus believe about Karma?
When Jesus walked out of the wilderness, he said something
that changed the world and the way we think about it: “Repent, for the kingdom
of heaven has come near.” He didn’t say, “Repent, because you are a miserable
sinner.” He didn’t say, “Repent, or suffer the fires of Hell!” He said to
repent, or change your mind and behavior, because I am proclaiming a new way to
think about life, the Kingdom of Heaven, and it is very different from what you
have been taught and what you now believe.
Did he mean it? I believe the clarion call of his defining
mission statement, the Sermon on the
Mount, was “You have heard it said, but I say to you…” So, for instance, “You have heard it said do not
murder, but I say to you if you are angry with your sister you will be judged.
Call her a fool and you are in danger of the fires of hell.” That escalated
quickly, and beyond simple Karma!
He says things like, “you have heard it was said, ‘do not
commit adultery.’ But I tell you that if you look at a woman lustfully you have committed adultery in your
heart.” Has your eye ever lingered over the SI Swimsuit Edition?
Jesus raises the bar way beyond the rules the spiritual leaders
and the elite of his day had outlined so that they could feel Karmic peace
about themselves, and look good in front of others.
But life in the Kingdom of Heaven goes so much further than
Karma. ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth?’ Karma. ‘No, turn the other cheek.’
Kingdom. ‘Someone takes your shirt?’ Karma. ‘Give them your coat also.’ Kingdom.
But here is where Jesus sticks the knife into any notion we
might have that Karma is in any way compatible with the Kingdom of Heaven:
You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate
your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for
those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in
heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the
evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
Bam. The Kingdom of Heaven is not business as usual. Love
your enemies. Recognize God loves your enemies. Don’t hope for Karma for them,
and don’t expect it for yourself. Jesus goes so far as to say, “Do not resist
an evil person.” How you get your head around that one? Dietrich Bonhoeffer
struggled deeply with this very command of Jesus when he ultimately decided to
participate in a plot to kill Hitler. These are not just pretty words. If we
hear them and try to live them it will be the hardest thing we have ever done. This
is a Kingdom, and the rule is a radically different than anything in our old
way of thinking or experience. This is why we need to repent. We need to change
the way we think and feel to live the Kingdom of Heaven. Jesus said the Kingdom
of Heaven is near and that Kingdom is based on a radical and costly love we
have not yet even imagined.
The Rich Man and Lazarus
So the first thing we need to remember to read this parable
is our tendency to think in Karma. The second is more stagecraft.
So in a wider context, Luke 16:1 tells us Jesus is teaching
his disciples. So imagine Jesus
teaching here (area on the stage), and his disciples are gathered around him.
But wait; there is more… In verse 14 we see a wider audience, the most revered
religious people of the day, a group of Pharisees. They are standing or sitting
over here (second location on the stage), just beyond the inner circle, listening
with ill intent to everything Jesus is saying, looking for a way to discredit
him in court and even have him killed. Simply remember the repeating theme of
the Sermon on the Mount, “You have heard it said…, but I say to you…” The
Pharisees were the “You have heard it saids.”
Jesus had not been complimentary. Let may give you just one example of what
Jesus said directly to them earlier in the gospel of Luke, chapter 11, verse 46:
And you experts in the law, woe to
you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you
yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.
Saying that kind of stuff to the powerful can get you
killed. Jesus is aware of the stakes, and of his disciple’s need to understand
the Kingdom of Heaven as it is radically different than what they have heard
these teachers say.
So to the parable:
19 “There was a rich man who was
dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from
the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 “The time came when the beggar
died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and
was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment,
he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father
Abraham, have
pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my
tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’
25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son,
remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus
received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And
besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so
that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over
from there to us.’
27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you,
father, send Lazarus to my family, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him
warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and
the Prophets; let them listen to them.’
30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the
dead goes to them, they will repent.’
31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not
listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone
rises from the dead.’”
So this story could not be more “karmic.” You do evil, by
active intent or by indifference, and you get punished; you suffer the fires of
hades, horrible torment. Did Jesus really believe this? Is that the point of
his story? This is an extraordinarily Greek idea. To the Greeks, on arrival at
the Gates of Hades your final destination was determined by your deeds during
life. To be condemned to ultimate torment was only true for the very worst people.*
Justice was Karmic, and weighed by the scales of deed and thought.
There are many levels to this parable, but I think Jesus was
being intentionally absurd, for the benefit of his disciples and to warn the
Pharisees, who loved money and power. The Pharisees believed in a deep way they
got what they deserved in life, while the poor beggar likely got what he
deserved; Karma.
Jesus’ disciples also believed this deeply before learning of
the Kingdom of Heaven from him. One time when they saw a blind man they asked Jesus
who sinned, the man or his parents? Someone had to have! I believe one of the
biggest challenges Jesus faced in ministry was to confront the cultural Karmic belief
of his time and help his followers repent
and begin to think and act from the Kingdom of Heaven and not Karma.
Let me give you one more example. Remember the story of the
Rich Young Ruler? He was a good man who, unlike many of the Pharisees, actually
did follow the rules and lived with compassion. Despite this he wanted to know
what he needed to do to be saved. Jesus in essence said ‘One thing you lack: give
up your Karma, the fortune you seem to feel you deserve, and follow me.’ He could
not do it. It wasn’t fair. He walked away. The disciples could tell Jesus was
truly moved and disappointed. Remember his response to the disciples? “It is
easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to be
saved.” Now the disciples were mostly not rich, but they finally begin to understand
what Jesus was really saying: you have to give up your Karma and live in the
Kingdom of Heaven, and you won’t get what you deserve.
The disciples began to get it. They asked, “Who then can be
saved?” Jesus’ answer is key to the parable we read: “What is impossible with
man is possible with God.”
The Chasm
Remember what was impossible in the parable? There was this
fixed chasm that could not be crossed between Abraham’s side and the torments
of Hades. Who put it there? Did God really create the river Styx? Does he act
out of a cosmic sense Karma? Would it delight him if we got what we deserved?
Is that the Kingdom of Heaven Jesus proclaimed? If it is, then there is no
place for the cross. The point of the Kingdom of Heaven is that you and I are
not going to get what we deserve. Jesus did.
So if God didn’t create the chasm who or what does? I think
the point of the story is that we construct this great chasm, and it is because
we insist on our sense of Karma or justice, when it benefits us or makes us
feel good about ourselves or condemns those we judge. And the more we cling to
it, and the more we insist on it, the wider the chasm becomes. Karma permeates
our thinking, the “You have heard it saids…” But the Kingdom of Heaven says to
turn the other cheek, to not resist an evil person, to love your enemy and pray
for them. The Kingdom of Heaven is not a balance of good and bad works that
ultimately determines our eternal destiny. God’s justice is not Karma; it is
grace at the cost of a cross. You see, unlike Karma, God causes his rain to
fall on the righteous and the unrighteous.
Living the Kingdom of Heaven
So let me humbly preach the gospel to you; Karma is not like
the Kingdom of Heaven we inherit as dearly loved children. We all need to
repent and rethink life in light of the Kingdom of Heaven because we are not
going to get what we deserve, and neither is our enemy.
How do we repent? Who do we need to forgive? Who do we need
to love, who does not deserve it? Do we hate ISIS? Do we resent religious
people who have hurt us deeply in the past because of our faith, or our beliefs
about gender or race, or sexuality? If you get it, this is really hard stuff. Bonhoeffer
and Hitler hard stuff. At a very deep level I want a bully to get what he or
she deserves. But the Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven is really, really good
news—it puts justice, fate and our sense of Karma firmly in God’s hands. We are
therefore free to live from the Kingdom of Heaven, to love radically, and to be
loved extravagantly by God.
Amen
* http://www.ancient.eu/Hades/ HADES THE UNDERWORLD
The god Hermes was believed to lead souls to the
river Styx in the underworld, at which point the aged boatman Charon ferried
them to the gates of Hades where Kerberos - the ferocious three-headed dog (or
fifty-headed according to Hesiod) with serpents coming out of its body - stood
guard to keep souls in rather than to keep others out. It was for payment to
Charon that bereaved family members put a coin in the mouth of the deceased (for Greeks the
traditional coin was the low-value obol). The unburied or those without the
means to pay the boatman were condemned to wander the Earth as ghosts. This
belief hints at the ambiguous nature of Hades. It was not necessarily a place
of torment and suffering but in most cases, simply the final resting place of
the soul.
On arrival at the gates of Hades, the final
destination of the souls was determined by an assessment of their actions
whilst they were alive. Traditionally, the three judges of souls were Minos,
Rhadamanthys, and Aiakos, themselves noted for their honourable lives. Souls
judged to have led especially good lives were first taken to drink the waters
of the River Lethe which made them forget all bad things, and then they were
taken to the idyllic Elysian Fields. Those souls judged to have led bad lives
were put in the hands of the Furies and taken to Tartarus, the lowest level of Hades, to
receive punishment for their misdeeds. The worst-offending souls, those who had
offended the gods with their impiety, were condemned to eternal torment.
Examples of those so punished were Sisyphos who had to forever roll a rock up a
hill, Tantalos who could never quench his thirst, Oknos who plaits one end of a
rope while a donkey eats the other end, the daughters of Danaus who had to try
and fill a sieve with water, and Ixion who was tied to an ever-spinning wheel.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Launching
One young man off to Navy boot camp this week, and one still in college in India. One a Freshman at MSU and one still in high school. Raising children gets much easier with respect to the physical drain, but the emotional stakes become much higher. One holds to the promises (for you, your children and as many as the Lord shall call).
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Process of Acceptance
I suppose the process of acceptance will pass through the usual four stages:
(i) this is worthless nonsense;
(ii) this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view;
(iii) this is true, but quite unimportant;
(iv) I always said so.
Journal of Genetics Vol. 58, page 464 (1963).
(i) this is worthless nonsense;
(ii) this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view;
(iii) this is true, but quite unimportant;
(iv) I always said so.
Journal of Genetics Vol. 58, page 464 (1963).
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Twitter Fiction--100 character stories.
Temporal Displacement sounded like a killer app. Ironical, I mused, throwing my worthless iPhone in the raptor’s maw.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Generationally-Neutral Fiscal Policies
Our nation is facing a day of reckoning of debt. The costs of programs such as Medicare, Social Security and federal pensions will overwhelm any reasonable projection of future GDP in the next 20 or 30 years. While it is questionable if the Baby Boomers actually contributed enough over time to fund their anticipated golden retirement, even if they have done so this money, held in trust, is gone. President Obama recently convened a bipartisan commission to look at these “third rail” political issues, and though I commend the effort I am skeptical of the outcome.
In order to avert what will surely become a generational divide, we need to add another term to the budgeting lexicon. We talk at times about revenue-neutral policies and legislation. We need to speak of generationally-neutral fiscal policies as well. The current post-boomer generation is going to be saddled with trillions of dollars of national debt, and a legacy of unfunded, underfunded and looted mandates. They will refuse, as well they should, to support this burden, and they will have the growing political power to do so. Politicians are demonstrably unable to address this growing problem and be re-elected, and so a non-elected, broadly representative body of multi-partisan financial policy experts needs to vet legislation for generational neutrality. If the cost of a program, other than monies needed for national defense, exceeds the projected revenue of the generation benefiting from and implementing it, then that legislation goes back to Congress. I am ashamed of the fiscal situation that my children are inheriting from my generation and the one just before me, and we need to make the hard choices now to remedy this. If not, we will be passing down “the sins of the fathers unto their children to the third and forth generation. . .” This is not the legacy I want to leave for my children.
In order to avert what will surely become a generational divide, we need to add another term to the budgeting lexicon. We talk at times about revenue-neutral policies and legislation. We need to speak of generationally-neutral fiscal policies as well. The current post-boomer generation is going to be saddled with trillions of dollars of national debt, and a legacy of unfunded, underfunded and looted mandates. They will refuse, as well they should, to support this burden, and they will have the growing political power to do so. Politicians are demonstrably unable to address this growing problem and be re-elected, and so a non-elected, broadly representative body of multi-partisan financial policy experts needs to vet legislation for generational neutrality. If the cost of a program, other than monies needed for national defense, exceeds the projected revenue of the generation benefiting from and implementing it, then that legislation goes back to Congress. I am ashamed of the fiscal situation that my children are inheriting from my generation and the one just before me, and we need to make the hard choices now to remedy this. If not, we will be passing down “the sins of the fathers unto their children to the third and forth generation. . .” This is not the legacy I want to leave for my children.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Children and Fathers
Daaaaaddeeeeeeee!!! The scream rang out through the fellowship hall as a 2 year old bundle of pigtails, pink cheeks and sneakers came barreling into the room, oblivious to the meeting in progress. Maggie caught my eye on her way to the nursery, and having not seen me all day, she was off like a shot. I sat at the back of the room, expecting her to come in with Kate and the rest of the kids anytime, and so I was ready for her. I met her halfway across the room and caught her up as she jumped into my arms, a wiggling, giggling bundle of unbridled joy. She rested her head on my shoulder and hugged my neck as I carried her back to the nursery and we got her settled in. Only a pulseless rock wouldn’t be moved to tears at a greeting like that. The guileless, reckless and unfettered love of a young child is a wondrous gift of God.
Mary Kay Dyer, our Children’s Minister, had just been teaching about one of her two favorite scriptures, Mark 10:13-16:
People were bringing little children to Jesus to have him touch them, but the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it." And he took the children in his arms, put his hands on them and blessed them.
This episode got me thinking about one of my favorite passages too, Hebrews 4:16:
Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.
Now Maggie is not perfect. She is a skillful 2 year old schemer, schmoozer, stinker and stomper, who realized young that wallflower is not the preferred posture when the youngest of 4. It is even remotely possible that she had been naughty earlier in the day, though to look in her eyes you would hardly believe it. If so, nothing could have been further from her mind when she saw me and ran for my arms. She hesitated not a moment with the thought I might turn away or shush her up because of some meeting. It never entered her mind I might stop her before she jumped into my arms to question her about her behavior that day. I was her daddy and she my little girl--end of story. She approached me full tilt, as a little child, absolutely confident of my unconditional love. She knows charm only goes so far, and that I will discipline her when needed and appropriate; still she runs to me with abandon, knowing deeply things about her father's love I am still learning about my heavenly father's.
Mary Kay Dyer, our Children’s Minister, had just been teaching about one of her two favorite scriptures, Mark 10:13-16:
People were bringing little children to Jesus to have him touch them, but the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it." And he took the children in his arms, put his hands on them and blessed them.
This episode got me thinking about one of my favorite passages too, Hebrews 4:16:
Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.
Now Maggie is not perfect. She is a skillful 2 year old schemer, schmoozer, stinker and stomper, who realized young that wallflower is not the preferred posture when the youngest of 4. It is even remotely possible that she had been naughty earlier in the day, though to look in her eyes you would hardly believe it. If so, nothing could have been further from her mind when she saw me and ran for my arms. She hesitated not a moment with the thought I might turn away or shush her up because of some meeting. It never entered her mind I might stop her before she jumped into my arms to question her about her behavior that day. I was her daddy and she my little girl--end of story. She approached me full tilt, as a little child, absolutely confident of my unconditional love. She knows charm only goes so far, and that I will discipline her when needed and appropriate; still she runs to me with abandon, knowing deeply things about her father's love I am still learning about my heavenly father's.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)